Shell marketing consultant quits, accusing agency of ‘excessive harms’ to atmosphere | Shell

A senior safety consultant has give up working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil gas producer in a bombshell public video of causing “extreme harms” to the surroundings.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for climate change risks” and urged others within the oil and gasoline business to “stroll away while there’s still time”.

The manager, who works for the independent agency Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 workers. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she said she had quit due to Shell’s “double-talk on local weather”.

Dennett accused the oil and gasoline firm of “working past the design limits of our planetary programs” and “not putting environmental security earlier than production”.

She said: “Shell’s stated security ambition is to ‘do no hurt’ – ‘Objective Zero’, they name it – and it sounds honourable however they are utterly failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and fuel extraction causes extreme harms, to our climate, to our surroundings and to folks. And whatever they say, Shell is solely not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett told the Guardian she “couldn't marry these conflicts with my conscience”, adding: “I could not carry that any longer, and I’m able to cope with the results.”

Shell was a “major client” of Dennett’s business, which specialises in evaluating security procedures in high-risk industries together with oil and gasoline production. She started working with Shell in the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the business.

“I can now not work for an organization that ignores all the alarms and dismisses the dangers of climate change and ecological collapse,” she mentioned. “As a result of, opposite to Shell’s public expressions around net zero, they aren't winding down on oil and fuel, but planning to discover and extract rather more.”

Dennett – a criminal justice graduate who has spent her career in research and consultancy – was inspired to cease working with Shell after watching news footage of Extinction Insurrection local weather protesters urging the corporate’s workers to go away. The motion’s TruthTeller whistleblowing undertaking encourages oil and fuel staff to walk away from the industry.

The marketing consultant, who runs inside security surveys and is based in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to have the ability to stroll away and “many individuals working in fossil gasoline corporations simply aren’t so fortunate”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look within the mirror and ask themselves in the event that they really imagine their imaginative and prescient for more oil and gas extraction secures a safe future for humanity”.

In late 2020, several Shell executives in its clean power sector left amid experiences they have been pissed off at the tempo of Shell’s shift towards greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to cut back emissions shall be discussed on the meeting the place the Dutch activist group Observe This can push for the company’s policies to be extra consistent with the Paris local weather accord. Shell’s board has instructed buyers to reject the group’s resolution that asks it to set extra stringent climate objectives.

The Shell investor Royal London has said it intends to abstain on a vote on the agency’s climate transition proposals.

The Shell chief govt, Ben van Beurden, might experience an investor insurrection against his £13.5m pay packet at the AGM after the funding adviser Pirc urged a vote towards it.

Sign as much as the each day Enterprise Immediately electronic mail or follow Guardian Enterprise on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson stated: “Be in little question, we are decided to deliver on our global strategy to be a web zero firm by 2050 and 1000's of our individuals are working arduous to achieve this. Now we have set targets for the short, medium and long term, and have every intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon vitality, although the world will nonetheless need oil and fuel for many years to return in sectors that may’t be easily decarbonised.”

Shell additionally faces the prospect of a potential windfall tax to fund cuts to household payments after the energy trade reported bumper profits fuelled by the rise in market prices, prompting opposition parties to call on the federal government to bring in a one-off levy.

On Monday, the biggest oil and gas producer within the North Sea spoke out towards a one-off levy, arguing it could lead to the business approving fewer initiatives.

Harbour Vitality’s chief government, Linda Prepare dinner, informed the Monetary Instances: “A better tax burden will make it tougher for new oil and gas projects to fulfill funding hurdle rates, meaning fewer tasks might be sanctioned.

“This is at a time when business is being encouraged to increase home UK oil and fuel manufacturing and support an orderly vitality transition.”

Harbour has told the government it plans to take a position $6bn within the North Sea over three years as trade makes its case towards the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Cook dinner had acquired a £4.6m “golden hiya” from the agency.